Performance of Watermelon Cultivars, Middle Tennessee Experiment Station, 2000



Charles A. Mullins, Dennis Onks, and Roy Thompson

Interpretative Summary



‘Freedom’, ‘Sterling’, ‘Fandango’, and ‘SWT 6903' were the most acceptable seedless cultivars. ‘Royal Flush’, ‘Summer Flavor 800', ‘Summer Flavor 820' and ‘SWD 7201' were among the most promising seedy type cultivars.

Introduction



Watermelons are not grown extensively in Tennessee. Production for shipping and local markets appears to have potential for expansion for specialty seedy and seedless cultivars. Producing melons of a consistent size appears to be a problem. Weed control is difficult, but new herbicides should be labeled in the near future. An experiment was conducted at the Middle Tennessee Experiment Station at Spring Hill, Tennessee in 2000 to evaluate performance of 36 watermelon cultivars. Twelve of the cultivars were seedy, and 24 were seedless. One cultivar was yellow fleshed, and the others were red fleshed. 

Materials and Methods



The site was prepared for planting using conventional tillage in late April. Fertilizer was broadcast at 750 lb/A of 15-15-15 before final disking on May 18. Bensulide (Prefar) at 6.0 lb ai/A and naptalam (Alanap) at 4.0 lb ai/A were soil incorporated for weed control on May 18. Transplants of the selected cultivars were greenhouse grown in 4 inch peat pots. Four seeds were planted per pot and the stand was thinned to 2 hills per pot before transplanting. Plots consisted of one row with 5 hills spaced 4 ft apart in 12 ft rows. The cultivars were not replicated. Middles were cultivated on June 22. Fungicides included azoxystrobin (Quadris) or chlorothalonil (Bravo) and were applied on 7 to 14 day schedule. Esfenvalerate (Asana) at 0.05 lb ai/A was applied with each fungicide application.. Nine foliar pesticide applications were made throughout the season. Harvests were made on August 7 and August 15. 

Melon count and weight per plot were recorded. The number of melons over 18 lbs was recorded for each plot. The average melon weight was calculated.

Results and Discussion



‘SWT 6903’ and ‘Seedway 4502' were among the most productive seedless cultivars in number of melons per plot (Table 1). ‘SWT 6903' 18 wt/plot 703 had the largest weight of the seedless cultivars in pounds per plot. ‘SWT 6903' and ‘Fandango’ produced more melons that weighed over 18 pound per melon of the seedless cultivars. Melons of ‘Freedom’, ‘SWT 6903', ‘Sterling’, and ‘Fandango’ had the largest average weight of the seedless cultivars.
‘Celebration’ and ‘Royal Flush’ produced the most melons per acre of the seedy cultivars (Table 2). ‘Royal Flush’ produced the most pounds of the seedy cultivars. ‘Summer Flavor 800', ‘Summer Flavor 820', and ‘SWD 7201' produced heavier fruit than the other seedy cultivars.

Table 1. Yield in number, pounds, and average weight of seedless watermelon cultivars evaluated at the Middle Tennessee Experiment Station at Spring Hill, 2000.

Cultivar

Total no./plot

Total. lb/plot

Total no./plot over 18 lb

Avg wt all melons -lb

SWT 8705

17

220

7

12.95

SF 5544

15

223

4

14.87

SF 5244

21

304

9

14.48

HMX 6910

23

208

0

9.05

Millennium

20

201

0

10.05

Millionaire

22

305

7

13.87

Boston

18

256

3

14.23

Constitution

17

209

3

12.30

Freedom

16

278

9

17.38

Revolution

16

233

2

14.57

Athens

16

219

2

13.69

Triple Crown

24

322

7

13.42

Solid Gold

17

146

0

8.59

Triple Prize

20

283

5

14.15

Triple Star

19

255

3

13.43

Seedway 4502

32

340

2

10.63

Tri-X-Shadow

17

170

0

10.00

Tri-X-Palomar

18

156

0

8.67

Tri-X-313

19

251

7

13.21

RWM 8073

23

319

2

13.58

Sterling

11

205

9

18.64

BSI 9330

27

334

1

12.37

SWT 6903

38

703

18

18.50

Fandango

20

308

18

18.50



Table 2. Yield in number, weight, and average weight of seedy watermelon cultivars evaluated at the University of Tennessee Middle Tennessee Experiment Station at Spring Hill, TN, 2000.

Cultivar

Total no./plot

Total wt/plot

Total no./plot over 18 lb

Avg. wt all melons -lb

Summer Flavor 800

20

392

17

19.60

Summer Flavor 820

16

324

12

20.25

Summer Flavor 900

18

313

8

17.39

Mardi Gras

20

316

11

15.89

Celebration

28

439

11

15.68

Carnival

25

419

9

16.76

SWD 7201

19

368

12

19.37

Royal Flush

33

586

13

17.76

Royal Sweet

19

344

8

14.11

Crimson Sweet

23

402

10

17.48

Starbrite

20

356

10

17.80

Stars and Stripes

20

308

8

15.40


Email all comments and suggestions to ghonea@utk.edu
Copyright © 1999 by The University of Tennessee. All rights reserved.

This research represents one season's data and does not constitute recommendations.  After sufficient data is collected over the appropriate number of seasons, final recommendations will be made through research and extension publications.